Obama and Hillary's Day of Reckoning on Libya

Within a week, it was pretty clear to anyone paying attention that the President was full of B.S. to blame the Libya consulate attack on a youtube video.  The only problem was that you had to read foreign news sources and hear what the Libyan president had to say to work out that the munitions involved in the Libya attack, the precision of the strike on the consulate, and the Sept 11th anniversary all pointed to a well-planned assault to murder our ambassador on sovereign American soil.  Well, they've been forced to come clean after a month of solid lying.

So what in the world is going on when we have a president that has more details about what happened than any of us and then tries to pin the blame for the attack on us and our insensitivity towards Islamists by posting a mean video on youtube that no one had even heard of or seen? Even over the ambassador's body upon its return to Dover AFB with Hillary at his side...

Do you know when that movie was posted?  July 2nd! And we're supposed to believe the White House telling us that two months later, this obscure video sparks riots in Cairo and Libya simultaneously?  So why then were the Cairo protesters chanting "Obama, Obama we are all Osama"?  Could that be because of the 21 times the DNC "spiked the football" about the killing of Osama bin Laden at their convention the week before?  Certainly makes more sense than the youtube video.  I had been curious how the Zero Dark Thirty blockbuster about the killing of Osama would play over in the Middle East seeing how well the youtube video went over.  It was scheduled to come out in October to give the Obama campaign a nice boost, but has been quietly delayed until after the election.

The U.N. has been working on a resolution that Obama supports condemning the stigmatization, stereotyping, and profiling of people based on their religion.  It's an initiative of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), and is opposed by most Western democracies.  It urges countries to take effective steps "to address and combat such instances".  If taken seriously, it would stifle free speech and weaken security since profiling even at airport security checkpoints would be more scrutinized than it already is.  Could this be what all the lying is about?  I really don't know.  I just know that this is the stuff Obama was touting in his U.N. speech last month and that he doesn't like to let a crisis go to waste.

It appears, too that the State Department even denied requests for additional security for the ambassador in Libya and overlooked warnings of a deteriorating situation - including a cable on the day of the attack!  Christopher Stevens was worried.  As of today, we have testimony and emails, but we already knew the basics from the diary CNN found in the compound shortly after the attack.  Mind you, it took the FBI about 3 weeks to get there.  Any evidence or sensitive information must've been long gone by then.  In any case, it's increasingly clear to what extent Obama and Hillary both failed to answer the 3 A.M. phone call.